Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani has reportedly stepped down as a judge of the Lahore High Court (LHC), describing the decision as a painful one. The development has drawn attention to the challenges faced by members of the judiciary and the importance of an independent legal system in Pakistan.
A judge’s decision to leave office is an important matter because judges play a key role in protecting the law, hearing disputes and ensuring that people receive justice. When a judge decides to step down, questions naturally arise about the reasons behind the decision, the circumstances surrounding it and its possible impact on the judicial system.
The words “a painful decision” suggest that leaving the position was not an easy choice. However, the exact reasons for Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani’s reported departure, along with the full details of the circumstances, need to be confirmed through an official statement or a reliable news report.
Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani’s Reported Resignation
The reported development concerns Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and his position as a judge of the Lahore High Court. His reported decision to step down has brought the matter into public discussion.
Judges hold positions that require them to deal with legal disputes, interpret the law and make decisions that can affect individuals, businesses and government institutions. Their work requires patience, careful thinking and a strong commitment to legal principles.
For this reason, any major change involving a judge can become a matter of public interest. People want to understand what led to the decision and whether it will have any wider effect on the courts.
At the same time, it is important to separate confirmed information from claims or speculation. Without a verified statement explaining the circumstances, it would be incorrect to assign a specific reason to the reported decision.
Why the Decision Has Drawn Attention
The judiciary is one of the main pillars of Pakistan’s constitutional system. Courts help settle disputes, protect legal rights and review matters brought before them under the law.
The Lahore High Court is an important part of this system. It deals with a wide range of legal matters, including constitutional petitions, civil disputes, criminal cases and issues involving public authorities.
A judge’s departure can therefore attract attention beyond the legal community. Lawyers, citizens and observers of public affairs may want to know whether the decision is connected to personal circumstances, professional considerations or wider institutional issues.
However, the importance of a judicial resignation does not automatically mean that it points to a problem within the court. Every case must be understood on the basis of reliable facts, official records and statements from the people involved.
Justice Kayani’s reported use of the words “a painful decision” has added interest to the development. Still, the phrase alone does not explain the reasons behind the decision or establish that any particular dispute or disagreement was involved.
The Role of the Lahore High Court
The Lahore High Court is one of Pakistan’s major superior courts. It performs an important role in the country’s legal system by hearing cases and ensuring that legal matters are handled according to the Constitution and applicable laws.
The court hears different kinds of cases, depending on its legal powers and jurisdiction. These can include matters involving civil rights, criminal proceedings, administrative decisions and questions about the actions of public bodies.
High Court judges are expected to examine the facts, consider arguments from the parties and apply the law fairly. Their decisions can have a direct impact on people’s lives, including their property, freedom, employment and access to public services.
The work of a High Court also helps maintain public confidence in the legal system. People need to believe that they can approach the courts when they feel that their legal rights have been affected.
For this reason, changes in the position of a judge are closely watched. Even so, the court’s work is carried out through its wider judicial structure, and the effect of an individual judge’s departure depends on the circumstances and the official arrangements that follow.
Main Reasons Behind Justice Kayani’s Decision
According to reports published on October 28, 2026, Justice Kayani submitted his resignation to President Asif Ali Zardari. In his letter, he mentioned personal reasons, health concerns following recent surgery and concerns about the independence of the judiciary.
He also raised objections to changes introduced through the 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments. In his view, these changes had weakened the independence and position of the high courts.
Justice Kayani said he had observed what he considered to be growing control of the executive over judicial institutions, including decisions about the appointment and transfer of judges. He argued that such interference had damaged public trust in the independence of the courts.
These statements reflect Justice Kayani’s own position as explained in his resignation letter. They should not be taken as a court finding that the constitutional amendments or government actions were unlawful. The debate over judicial independence remains an important legal and political issue in Pakistan. <Cite refs={[“turn513602search0″,”turn513602news4”]}/>
Concerns Over Judicial Independence
Judicial independence means that judges should be able to make decisions according to the Constitution, the law and the facts of each case without improper pressure.
This principle is important because courts sometimes hear cases involving government departments, public officials and powerful organisations. If people believe that judges cannot make decisions freely, their confidence in the justice system may suffer.
In his resignation letter, Justice Kayani expressed concern that recent constitutional changes had affected the independence of high courts. He also questioned the growing role of the executive in matters relating to judicial appointments and transfers.
His concerns come amid a wider debate over constitutional changes and the way judges are appointed, transferred and assigned cases in Pakistan.
Supporters of changes to the judicial system have argued that reforms can improve the working of courts and help address delays. Critics, however, have raised concerns about the possible effect of these changes on judicial independence.
Justice Kayani’s resignation has brought these questions back into public discussion. His departure also highlights the importance of maintaining public trust in the courts and ensuring that judicial arrangements are seen as fair and transparent.
The Impact of Constitutional Amendments
Justice Kayani specifically referred to the 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments in his resignation letter.
The 26th Amendment, passed in October 2024, introduced major changes to parts of Pakistan’s judicial system, including the process for selecting the chief justice of Pakistan and arrangements for constitutional cases.
The 27th Amendment, passed in November 2025, brought further changes to the country’s constitutional and judicial structure. It also changed rules relating to the transfer of high court judges.
These changes became the subject of debate among lawyers, judges, political leaders and legal experts. While supporters presented reforms as a way to improve the justice system, critics questioned whether some provisions could affect the independence of judges.
Justice Kayani stated that, in his assessment, the changes had harmed the independence and institutional strength of the high courts. His resignation letter shows that these concerns played an important part in his decision to leave judicial office. <Cite refs={[“turn513602search0″,”turn513602search8”]}/>
Transfer From Islamabad High Court to Lahore High Court
Justice Kayani had previously served at the Islamabad High Court (IHC), where he held the position of senior puisne judge, meaning the senior-most judge after the chief justice.
In April 2026, he was transferred from the Islamabad High Court to the Lahore High Court. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan approved the transfer on April 28, along with the transfers of Justice Babar Sattar to the Peshawar High Court and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz to the Sindh High Court.
The transfers became controversial in legal circles. Justice Kayani and other judges had raised concerns about judicial administration and the transfer arrangements.
Before his transfer, Justice Kayani had been among the senior judges at the Islamabad High Court. His move to the Lahore High Court changed his position in the seniority order.
Reports also noted that he was not assigned to a division bench at the Lahore principal seat despite his seniority. A later duty roster assigned him to a single bench at the court’s Rawalpindi registry.
These developments form part of the background to his resignation. However, his decision was based on the reasons set out in his letter, which included health concerns and objections relating to judicial independence. <Cite refs={[“turn513602search0″,”turn513602search9”]}/>
More Than 23,000 Cases During His Judicial Career
In his resignation letter, Justice Kayani stated that he had decided more than 23,000 cases of different kinds during his years of judicial service.
He said he had worked to uphold the Constitution, protect fundamental rights and deliver justice without fear or favour.
The number highlights the amount of work he says he handled during his judicial career. Courts across Pakistan face large numbers of cases, and delays can create serious problems for people waiting for decisions.
For an ordinary citizen, a court case may involve a property dispute, family matter, criminal charge, employment issue or complaint against a government department. Long delays can increase legal costs and place additional pressure on families.
Justice Kayani expressed particular concern about ordinary people seeking justice. He said their needs had too often been overlooked and that their difficulties continued to grow.
His comments drew attention to an issue that affects many people who depend on the courts: ensuring that the legal system remains focused on the needs of those seeking justice.
Why Ordinary Citizens Need an Independent Judiciary
An independent judiciary is important for every citizen, regardless of income, social position or political influence.
People approach courts when they believe their rights have been violated or when they need a legal dispute to be resolved. They expect judges to consider the evidence and apply the law fairly.
If a person believes that decisions depend on outside pressure rather than legal principles, confidence in the courts can decline. This can affect not only individual cases but also the public’s trust in government institutions.
Justice Kayani’s resignation letter placed special importance on the problems faced by ordinary litigants. He argued that the people who need the justice system most should not be neglected.
His remarks also raise a broader question about access to justice in Pakistan. Improving court performance requires attention to case backlogs, legal costs, delays and the fair treatment of all parties.
An effective justice system should allow people to present their cases, receive fair hearings and understand the decisions made by the courts.
Justice Kayani Plans to Return to Legal Practice
Justice Kayani said he intended to leave the bench and return to legal practice. He explained that he wanted to continue serving the public, protecting people’s rights and promoting legal awareness.
His decision means that he plans to remain connected to the legal profession, although in a different role.
Lawyers play an important part in helping citizens understand their rights, prepare legal cases and seek remedies when they believe they have been treated unfairly. Legal awareness can also help people understand their responsibilities and the correct ways to address disputes.
Justice Kayani expressed gratitude to his teachers, fellow judges and family members for their guidance and support during his career. He also acknowledged their support during the discussions that led to his decision to resign.
His letter presented the decision as a difficult personal choice shaped by his health, conscience and views about the judicial system.
Justice Kayani’s Resignation Comes Before Retirement
Justice Kayani was expected to retire in February 2032, according to reports. His resignation therefore came several years before his scheduled retirement.
The timing has added to public interest in the development, especially given his earlier position at the Islamabad High Court and the debate surrounding the transfer of judges.
A judge leaving office before the normal retirement age can raise questions about the circumstances and the possible effects on the courts. In this case, Justice Kayani explained his reasons in a letter addressed to the president.
The resignation also comes at a time when judicial independence, constitutional reforms and the powers of different state institutions remain subjects of public debate.
The immediate administrative steps following the resignation will determine how the vacancy is handled under the relevant rules. Any wider effect on the court’s work will depend on the arrangements made by the judicial authorities.
What Happens Next?
Justice Kayani’s departure is likely to keep attention focused on judicial independence and the recent changes to Pakistan’s legal system.
His resignation letter provides his own explanation of why he decided to leave. He referred to personal health concerns, his conscience and his belief that the 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments had harmed the independence of the high courts.
The resignation does not, by itself, settle the wider debate over those amendments. Their legal and practical effects remain matters for the appropriate institutions and legal processes.
For citizens, the central issue is whether courts can continue to provide fair hearings, protect fundamental rights and decide cases without improper pressure.
The government, judiciary, lawyers and other relevant institutions all have roles in maintaining confidence in the legal system. Clear rules, fair procedures and respect for constitutional principles are important parts of that responsibility.
Conclusion
Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani’s resignation as a Lahore High Court judge marks an important development in Pakistan’s judicial affairs.
Describing the decision as painful, he said that personal reasons, health concerns and matters of conscience had influenced his choice. He also expressed serious concerns about the independence of high courts, the transfer and appointment of judges, and the difficulties faced by ordinary litigants.
After reporting that he had decided more than 23,000 cases during his judicial career, Justice Kayani said he intended to return to legal practice and continue working to protect people’s rights and promote legal awareness.
His resignation has renewed discussion about the balance of power between state institutions and the need for an independent judiciary. While his views represent his assessment of the situation, the broader questions raised by his departure remain important for Pakistan’s legal system.
Ultimately, public confidence depends on a justice system in which people can seek help, receive fair treatment and trust that decisions are made according to the law.
Read Also: check
